![]() ![]() After all, in his mind, he did those things for Padme in his own twisted, desperate way. What If Fiction ( This is the best place for "general" questions)įor non-serious answers for real world science problems try:Īnd just for fun, don't forget to check out our friends atĪs terrible as killing children and destroying the temple is, it's nothing compared to losing Padme. Who would win ( Go here for questions about who would win in a fight or competition between two or more characters) This subreddit is for discussion of fiction using information about the universe and not meta information about the work. Spoilers from works older than six months may optionally be concealed using our flair system, however this is CSS-based and will work only in browsers. ![]() Our Spoiler policy must be observed for six months following the date of release.Comment spoilers should be formatted on a separate line as >!.Replace "Canon" with the work or body of fiction in question. If only the body of your post contains spoilers, you may instead make the title " Spoilers: Canon" and not use the link flair. The title of your post should not contain spoilers for six months from the date of release."Speed Force" with no further explanation when asked a question about the Flash) do not constitute satisfactory answers. Report anything that discusses metadata or involves personal attacks. Upvote good content downvote incorrect information.(This doesn't, of course, mean there isn't room for further discussion.) Search for your question, it may have been asked and answered before.Any sort of competition questions belong in whowouldwin.AskScience and AskHistorians exist for that. r/whatiffiction, a sister subreddit, has rules more accommodating to these sort of questions. General questions are discouraged without a firm set of in-universe rules, most of them boil down to "whatever the writer chooses" in terms of answers.Avoid questions about real-world pseudoscience (i.e. Any fiction is allowed not just science fiction.You already know Bruce Wayne is Batman, you already know Darth Vader is Anakin Skywalker, you already know Sauron is evil. However, if you choose to roleplay, please remember that you must answer as if you had all the information available to a member of the audience. We discourage but do not forbid roleplaying.Answer the questions from a Watsonian perspective only- no Doylist answers.your posts with the setting you wish to discuss.Take the fictional rules of the universe to their logical conclusion, ad absurdum. Doylist perspective can be found here, here, and in the dictionary definitions of the two terms.) Or as calls it Watsonian, not a Doylist point of view (Further reading on Watsonian vs. Use in-universe knowledge, rules, and common sense to answer the questions. This is the kind of fear that prevents parents from having tough conversations with their children, students from engaging in class participation, employees from speaking up at a meeting, or any one of us from talking to other people at a party.It's like Ask Science, but all questions and answers are written with answers gleaned from the universe itself. Saying the wrong thing is perceived as embarrassing, humiliating, and disempowering, and could lead to crippling self-doubt. It is proof that we are not as smart as we think, not astute enough to have the right answers, not empathic enough to respond to other people’s needs. While being wrong could simply be a result of not having the facts straight, not being fully present in that moment, or making an off-the-mark assumption, when this fear kicks in, being wrong becomes something bigger. Worry about giving the wrong answer, making a wrong prediction, or believing something that is not supported by evidence are some instances of this fear. An example of emotional granularity is instead of thinking or saying “I’m feeling good” to say “I’m feeling pleased with my performance.” Emotional granularity is an important aspect of emotion regulation, one of the most important and rarely taught life skills. Emotional granularity, according to Lisa Feldman Barrett, the term originator and author of How Emotions Are Made, refers to our ability to experience and describe our emotions with high precision. One of the most important achievements in the neuroscience of emotions is the discovery of emotional granularity. And that type of fear is not a single entity. The fear I refer to is the type that becomes an obstacle to growth and achievement. Nor is it the pathological fear associated with clinical phobias that, unfortunately, a considerable proportion of people suffer from. But the fear I am referring to in this context is not the biological, amygdala-based, stimulus-response fear that we experience when we see a snake or a spider.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |